Bug #4001
Clustering doesn't scale by map size
| Status: | Rejected | Start date: | 2012-06-02 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | - | % Done: | 0% |
|
| Category: | Code | |||
| Target version: | 0.8 |
Description
nfo FIRS had scaling parameters which adjusted to map size.
nml FIRS appears to miss these. Figure out how they worked and re-implement them :)
History
#1 Updated by andythenorth 9 months ago
Code in parameters.pnml suggests otherwise; this might be bogus.
#2 Updated by andythenorth 9 months ago
Previously, nfo FIRS varied the clustering specific to mines, forests and farms. This might not be the case in nml firs currently?
#3 Updated by andythenorth 9 months ago
The scaling parameters all appear to be present and with the correct values in nml FIRS.
I'm not sure that the results are the same - I think there are more clusters per map-size with nml FIRS compared to nfo FIRS, but lots of other things have changed (number industry relative probability of industries etc).
#4 Updated by andythenorth 9 months ago
I think this is probably ok, having tested + read code ;)
#5 Updated by andythenorth 9 months ago
- Status changed from New to Rejected